Sunday, September 27, 2009

New Ski Gear!

This year I've decided, with some influence from the lady, to delve into the world of downhill skiing. I'd tried it last year for the first time since childhood, and will be going much more frequently this season.

Since renting can be a pain, and is expensive if you do it frequently, I went out and bought ski gear yesterday. The lady pointed me in all the right directions. We started (and fortunately ended) at Action Sports in Branford, who had a "ski swap" yesterday. I had a price in mind: $500, maximum. Ideally, $400 or less.

The first thing is the most obvious: skis. We started out front where they had the tent with all the stuff people brought in to swap (pretty much they just gave you store credit). A very nice lady from the store helped us out, and told me I'd probably need to go with around a 174cm length for the skis. We found a very good pair of used K2 Omni Hawks for $150, and I was sold right away. We then went inside and saw some real fancy new skis, but they were $400, so I went with the used ones. Glad I did that. They look nice.

Next: boots. We started again out front in the tent, where another guy from the store was fitting people. He sized me up as about 29cm. We looked around and tried on a couple pairs. I ended up getting a pair of 29.5cm Lange boots, which fit pretty well. I think they were around $40, but the receipt I have isn't showing them (maybe I pay for them later?). Good boots. I was then told to leave them for tuning and whatnot and to pick them up November 1st. Good deal.

Then we went back in and had to find a helmet, goggles, and poles. An older guy named Mark, great guy, helped us out. I ended up with a cheap but decent pair of Axis Powder pols for $30. The helmet is a nice flat gray Giro Encore 2 model that I got for $50. Then there were the goggles. The first pair I tried on were decent, but I ended up going with a bigger pair of Smith Fuse Regulators for $90.

All told, I walked out with all the equipment I'll pretty much need (I'll probably need a new pair of pants) for under $400. Good stuff. Now I just need to learn to ski.

9-27-09: Spurs 5 - Burnley 0

Huge win for Spurs yesterday against newly promoted Burnley. I really wish ESPN2 showed this game, especially because it seemed like they'd had Burnley on there twice already (and none for Spurs until the big match on Halloween against Arsenal). Oh well.



Thursday, September 24, 2009

Premier League Video Highlights Now On Hulu

Neat.

 
 

Sent to you by Pat via Google Reader:

 
 

via EPL Talk by The Gaffer on 9/24/09

Excellent news for US residents who follow the Premier League club: Hulu has added Premier League highlights to its array of online videos and movies it has available on the popular online broadband site.

The availability of goal highlights from the past weekend of matches is made available in conjunction with Fox Soccer Channel.

Each week, Hulu will present:

  • Highlights from all ten games available as separate videos,
  • A weekend round-up,
  • Saves of the week, and
  • Goals of the week.

Each clip is approximately 2-3 minutes except for the weekend round-up which is 4-5 minutes.

In addition to highlights of the Premier League, Hulu and Fox Soccer Channel has made video highlights of UEFA Champions League also available.

Each video is preempted by a commercial.

Thanks to reader timmyg for the tip.

Related posts:

  1. It's Time for the Premier League to Concede Defeat in Video Highlights Fight
  2. Joost to Offer Premier League Highlights Via Internet
  3. The Future of Premier League Goal Highlights on the Internet


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

9-24-09: Lottery Winners

I was talking to some friends at lunch the other day about lottery winners. One of them had seen a program on TV that profiled recent lottery winners who had squandered their fortunes in a variety of foolish ways.

I was thinking of the difference was between a lottery winner squandering millions of dollars and a self-made millionaire losing their fortune. The difference is, of course, how they go about doing it. What decisions would a self-made person make versus someone who was simply lucky?

I thought maybe there had to be something in how they came across the money. Let’s take a more specific example of the self-made millionaire: Youtube. The guys who sold Youtube to Google were practically instant millionaires. Sure, they had worked hard to develop their product, but until Google signed the checks, they weren’t really all that wealthy (or had virtually any value at all). Suddenly, BAM, millionaires many times over.

So in one corner you have the founders of Youtube (who happened to be Chad Hurley, Steve Chen, and Jawed Karim). In the other corner you have John Q. Public, who suddenly finds himself the lucky winner of a $100 million Powerball jackpot. I’m not sure, but let’s assume the Youtube guys put a lot of time and effort into developing the website, but limited their risk (they didn’t bet everything on the site’s success), and they weren’t sure it was going to be nearly as big a hit as it was. I’d call that a “medium risk, moderately high return” going in. Whereas John Q. Public has a “low risk, very high return” plan.

Once each of the respective parties receive their “winnings,” how do they view the money? Luck? The end result of hard work? Does it actually matter?

I think it might, but I do think, in general, a person who worked for the money won’t spend it nearly as recklessly as a lottery winner. Now, what if the lottery winner had “invested” thousands of dollars over the course of many years into the lottery before winning? Could that play a role in how they spend the money? They’d have to see the purchase of a lottery ticket in a more business manner than the typical lottery player, who might buy one or two tickets a month (or year).

When you take the odds of success into account, the two parties are remarkably similar. How many Youtube stories are out there? Three guys, building a website, come across $1.65 billion from Internet giant Google. If you split it three ways (let’s say they did), that’s $500 million each. Even half that amount is more than any lottery jackpot I’ve heard of. There can only be a relative handful of such “winners” out there. Not quite as rare as the mega jackpot winner, but still quite rare.

I just think it’s an interesting relationship.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

9-23-09: Happy Birthday Bruce Springsteen

For those unaware, today is the 60th birthday of The Boss, a.k.a. Bruce Springsteen, the New Jersey native and musical mastermind of the E Street Band.

I grew up listening to Springsteen because of my father, who saw him in his very early days at the University of Massachusetts around 1972 or 1973. Springsteen was terrible, but over time became a big deal.

I’ve listened to Springsteen, mostly in the summer, since as long as I can remember. Here are some of my favorites: